By Burnett Munthali
The Malawi Electoral Commission (MEC) has hit the brakes on President Peter Mutharika’s order to relocate its headquarters to Blantyre, filing a court challenge against the executive directive.
The move has sparked a constitutional debate, with MEC arguing that the president’s order may compromise its independence and ability to discharge its duties.
The controversy began on October 10, 2025, when the president issued a directive requiring MEC and other statutory bodies to relocate to the commercial capital within three months.
MEC has taken umbrage with the order, citing Section 76(4) of the Constitution and Section 6(1) of the Malawi Electoral Commission Act, which safeguard its autonomy and powers.
In its petition, MEC argues that the president’s order may amount to unlawful interference with its constitutional and statutory powers, and is seeking a judicial review to determine the legitimacy of the directive.
The commission’s decision to approach the High Court underscores its commitment to upholding the rule of law and protecting its independence.
The outcome of this case is eagerly awaited, as it may have far-reaching implications for the country’s governance and electoral processes.
As the nation watches with bated breath, one thing is clear: the stakes are high, and the judiciary is being called upon to play a crucial role in resolving this impasse.
The case is set to be heard in the coming weeks, and stakeholders are hoping for a fair and impartial decision that will uphold the principles of democracy and good governance.
In the meantime, the debate continues, with many wondering what the future holds for MEC and the country’s electoral processes.