By Political Editor

Times Television’s Panelists Bishop Chafumuka may be neglecting the opportunity to convey the truth about the Malawi Congress Party.

His narrative lacks acknowledgment of the positive advancements made by the government under Dr. Lazarus Chakwera, even stating that MCP cannot win independently.

It appears that as a man of God, he is failing to shed light on Malawi’s developmental projects and the adversities faced by the Chakwera administration, including the profound impacts of COVID-19, Cyclone, and Cholera on the country’s economy and the livelihoods of its citizens. From my perspective, it seems that this clergyman harbors animosity towards Dr. Lazarus Chakwera, a fellow clergyman whom he supposedly supports through prayer.

In the realm of journalism, objectivity is paramount, and without equilibrium, fairness, and accuracy are compromised.

The bishop’s acrimonious rhetoric suggests a bias towards certain individuals, neglecting to address the atrocities committed during the reign of the previous Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) led by ANA ADAD, who treated the government apparatus as their personal domain.

I strongly urge the bishop to contemplate the atrocities such as the albino killings, the Buleya incident, the closure of universities, the misuse of ANA ADAD number plates, the Chimulilenji controversy, the scandal involving tons of bricks, the midnight six, and the cement scandal.

It is imperative that he refrains from deceiving the public for personal gain from the DPP and instead becomes a beacon of transparency, reality, and integrity in addressing matters of national significance.

The bishop must shift towards speaking the truth without using every opportunity to denigrate the MCP.

It is crucial for him to participate in discussions organized by the television network without constantly discrediting the top government officials without interviewing them or bringing them on the panel list.

The Media Responsibility highlights that Journalists should prioritize truth and objectivity in their reporting by avoiding sensationalism and bias in covering political events and upholding authorities accountable.

Constructive Criticism should also be aimed at improving governance and encouraging dialogue and debate for a better-informed Society not personalization of opinion and ideas.