Monday, April 6, 2026
No menu items!
spot_img
Home Blog Page 903

MEC issues public statement on photographing women in hijabs during voter registration

0



By Burnett Munthali

On Friday, November 15, the Malawi Electoral Commission (MEC) issued an important public statement regarding the taking of photographs during voter registration, specifically addressing concerns about women wearing hijabs. The statement seeks to clarify the Commission’s position on this matter to ensure an inclusive and respectful registration process for all Malawians.

The MEC recognizes the significance of respecting individual rights and religious freedoms, including the right of women to wear hijabs, while still adhering to the necessary requirements for voter identification. The Commission highlighted that it is committed to ensuring a smooth and fair registration process, and it has outlined procedures for handling registration photos of women in hijabs to avoid any inconvenience or misunderstanding.



In its statement, the MEC emphasized that voter registration officials have been instructed to work sensitively and with respect to religious and cultural attire. The Commission assures the public that every effort will be made to ensure the registration process does not discriminate against any individual or group, including those who wear the hijab for religious reasons.

To ensure the public stays informed about such developments, the MEC has encouraged all Malawians to join their WhatsApp community for real-time updates on voter registration and other electoral matters. This platform allows citizens to receive direct communications from the MEC, keeping them updated on any changes or important announcements.

For those interested in staying connected, the public can join the MEC WhatsApp community using the following link: Join MEC WhatsApp Community.

For further inquiries or clarification, Richard Mveriwa, the Communications Officer at MEC, can be contacted via cell phone at 0888870092. The MEC also provided its office address for any formal correspondence:
Chisankho House
Private Bag 113
Lilongwe, Malawi

The MEC’s statement reaffirms its commitment to conducting a fair, transparent, and inclusive voter registration process, where the rights and dignity of all Malawians are respected.

Reserve Bank of Malawi directs commercial banks to transfer foreign currency accounts to its control

0

By Burnett Munthali

In a significant move, the Reserve Bank of Malawi (RBM) has reportedly issued a verbal directive to all commercial banks in the country, instructing them to transfer foreign currency-denominated accounts under their management to RBM’s direct control. The directive, which has raised concerns among financial institutions and the business community, marks a new chapter in Malawi’s ongoing efforts to stabilize its foreign exchange reserves amid persistent economic pressures.

Sources within the banking sector suggest that this shift could allow the central bank to exercise greater oversight over foreign currency transactions, potentially helping to address Malawi’s foreign exchange shortages. RBM has been under pressure to manage declining foreign reserves, with currency shortages affecting importers, fuel suppliers, and local businesses dependent on foreign goods.


The central bank’s move comes against a backdrop of economic challenges, with Malawi grappling with a depreciating kwacha and rising inflation rates. With a limited supply of foreign exchange, RBM may be attempting to consolidate these resources, channeling them toward national priorities, such as essential imports and external debt servicing. However, the lack of formal written communication on the matter has left some banks seeking clarity on the implementation and legal framework for the directive.

Local businesses, particularly those with substantial foreign currency needs, have expressed concern about the potential impact on operations. Many worry that limited access to foreign currency could hinder their ability to import goods, meet contractual obligations, and plan future investments.

The directive has also raised questions about the autonomy of commercial banks and their role in managing foreign currency for customers. In recent years, RBM has introduced various measures to control foreign exchange flows, including tighter regulations on currency trading and monitoring of foreign currency accounts. However, this new directive represents one of the more assertive steps in centralizing control.

As the situation develops, financial experts are calling for transparent guidelines and engagement with the private sector to minimize disruptions. The RBM is yet to release an official statement clarifying the scope of the directive, its duration, and whether exemptions will be made for certain account holders, such as exporters or non-governmental organizations.

This move by RBM underscores the government’s strategy to manage foreign currency more stringently. However, the challenge lies in balancing control over foreign exchange resources with supporting a resilient, competitive business environment—key to fostering long-term economic growth in Malawi.

Mzimba CSOs elect new office bearers

0

By Chisomo Phiri

Mzimba Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) on Thursday elected new office bearers at their elective meeting.

Dennis Chiombeza from Family Health Services was elected the new chairperson of the CSOs after winning against the incumbent Christopher Melele of MIDCT by 17 to 6 votes.

In his acceptance speech, Chiombeza promised to work collaboratively with all stakeholders in implementing development activities.



In other categories, Stalin Mwandira of Shine on Malawi was elected as Secretary of the network, while George Lungu of Tovwirane elected as the Treasurer.

Mzimba has 41 organizations registered with the Non-Governmental Organizations Regulatory Authority (NGORA).

The new office bearers are expected to bring positive changes and work towards the betterment of the society.

DPP’s Commitment to Electoral Reforms: Separating Fact from Fiction



By Twink Jones Gadama

The recent article by Lyson Goodwin Sibande, criticizing DPP’s stance on electoral reforms, raises important questions about the party’s commitment to free and fair elections.

However, it’s crucial to examine the context and motivations behind DPP’s actions.

While it’s true that DPP defended the 2019 election results, it’s also important to acknowledge that the party has since acknowledged the need for electoral reforms.

The call for MEC chair Justice Annabel Mtalimanja’s resignation is not about undermining the electoral process but rather ensuring its integrity.

Moreover, Sibande’s assertions about DPP’s hypocrisy seem to be driven by a biased perspective, overlooking the party’s efforts to address electoral irregularities.

A closer look at the events leading up to the 2020 elections reveals a complex situation, with multiple actors involved.

It’s essential to recognize that DPP, AFORD, and UTM are working together to advocate for electoral reforms, which is a positive step towards strengthening Malawi’s democracy.

Rather than dismissing their efforts as hypocritical, we should encourage constructive dialogue and collaboration.


Exposing Biased Perspectives

A critical examination of Sibande’s article reveals a clear bias towards MCP, with the author failing to provide balanced reporting.

As an MCP supporter, Sibande’s views are tainted by party loyalty, undermining his credibility on this issue.

The article’s tone and language suggest a deliberate attempt to discredit DPP and its leaders, rather than engaging in constructive criticism.

This approach does little to advance the conversation on electoral reforms and only serves to polarize the debate.

The Way Forward

To truly address electoral irregularities and ensure free and fair elections, Malawians must engage in inclusive and respectful dialogue.

This requires setting aside party affiliations and focusing on the common goal of strengthening democracy.

DPP’s call for electoral reforms should be seen as an opportunity for collaboration, rather than an admission of guilt.

By working together, Malawian parties can create a more transparent and accountable electoral process.

In conclusion, while Sibande’s article raises important concerns, its biased perspective and failure to provide balanced reporting undermine its credibility.

A more constructive approach to addressing electoral reforms is necessary, one that prioritizes collaboration and inclusivity.

Shaming DPP’s hypocrisy : The party that defended a flawed election now questions MEC


By Lyson Goodwin Sibande

We are living in strange times. Our politicians especially from the opposing Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), Alliance for Democracy (AFORD) and United Transformation Movement (UTM) have abandoned all sense of reason and shame.  

How in the world can the opposition team up with DPP and even allow this party to lead them in a quest for electoral justice in Malawi? The DPP is guilty of gross violations of our constitution and electoral laws during the 2019 presidential election. For the first time in the history of our country, we had fresh presidential elections, the court removed a vice president from office and reinstated a former vice president, Members of Parliament secured a 6 years term and our elections month moved from May to September. All this happened to fix the damaged to our electoral laws caused by MEC under the DPP administration.

Mutharika and Jane Ansah



I mean, what a shameless thing,  that DPP is calling for the resignation of MEC chair, Justice Annabel Mtalimanja who has done nothing wrong, when APM staunchly defended MEC Chairperson Justice Jane Ansah amid proven irregularities during the 2019 elections?  This very same DPP that now seeks transparency at MEC, was in 2019 and 2020 the primary shield against electoral accountability and refused to acknowledge the widespread concerns about MEC’s credibility.

Remember, when Malawians demanded electoral justice through street protests, DPP mobilized women in the Southern Region through Seodi White and held counter-street demonstrations in Blantyre to support Ansah. They did this knowingly that elections were marred by irregularities and illegal use of tippex. As a matter of fact, some DPP women carried placards written, “Tippex sinkhani yonyozera Ansah.” Can you believe that?

And sadly, when the Constitutional Court annulled the 2019 presidential election for violating electoral laws, DPP was non-repentant. They rejected the decision of the High Court and appealed to the Supreme Court. That is how determined APM and DPP were to get away with the electoral injustice against the people of Malawi.

Until today, DPP and APM have not repented because they have continued to deny the illegitimacy of the 2019 electoral process. That is why I wonder and ask; since when has DPP truly sought electoral justice in Malawi?

Let me remind you, in case you have forgotten. In less than a year after losing the 2020 Fresh Presidential Elections, DPP and APM were still so bitter, in denial and confused that they went back to court and petitioned the court to nullify the 2020 elections. Yes! They did that. They wanted to remove President Chakwera from power and bring back APM against the wishes of Malawians.  This followed when Chakweras administration fired DPP MEC commissioners including Jean Mathanga and Linda Kunje on grounds that they were illegally appointed into the commission. 

DPP filed an application in June 2021 seeking nullification of Chakwera’s presidency claiming that he was elected through an illegally constituted MEC, when it was APM himself who had illegally constituted MEC.  The court dismissed the case and kicked DPP out of the court with costs.

If APM could not even legally constitute the MEC, why do you think DPP should be telling us anything about MEC?  Why should a party that once aggressively defended electoral injustice to cling to power be telling us today about how MEC must manage the 2025 elections? They lost the moral ground.

And it is very puzzling that UTM, a party that notably led the 2019/2020 resistance against DPP’s efforts to shield Ansah and protect tippexed results, can allow DPP to lead them on a pursuit for credible electoral process. 

DPP is an enemy of electoral justice and Malawians must treat this party as such unless APM publicly apologizes to Malawians for the 2019 elections disaster. Otherwise, DPP is practicing hypocrisy of the highest order, and taking Malawians for fools.