By Burnett Munthali

The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has stated that it is closely monitoring interactions between President Lazarus Chakwera’s Attorney General, Thabo Chakaka, and Malawi Electoral Commission (MEC) CEO Andrew Mpesi.

According to DPP sources, these meetings are occurring both inside and outside the National Tally Centre in Lilongwe.

The party emphasized that its monitoring is aimed at ensuring transparency and preventing any potential influence on the ongoing aggregation of election results.

DPP officials have expressed concern about the possibility of unauthorized interventions that could affect the integrity of the tallying process.

They underscored the importance of all electoral stakeholders respecting constitutional procedures and allowing MEC to carry out its mandate without external pressure.

The situation reflects heightened tensions surrounding the September 16, 2025 general elections, as parties remain alert to any developments that might impact the outcome.

Observers note that these claims, if substantiated, could further complicate the post-election political climate and influence public perception of electoral fairness.

Looking ahead, DPP’s vigilance over these interactions may have a mixed impact on Malawi’s political landscape.

On one hand, active monitoring could reinforce public trust among DPP supporters, signaling that the party is committed to safeguarding the integrity of the electoral process.

It may also act as a deterrent against potential attempts to manipulate results, thereby ensuring that MEC adheres strictly to constitutional procedures and transparent tallying practices.

However, constant scrutiny and public claims of suspicious meetings could heighten tensions between parties, fueling narratives of distrust and partisan confrontation.

If not managed responsibly, this environment may create uncertainty around the official announcement of results, potentially eroding confidence in electoral institutions among the general populace.

Over the medium term, how the DPP communicates its observations and engages with legal and civil society mechanisms will be crucial in maintaining political stability.

A constructive approach—where concerns are formally documented and addressed through proper channels—could strengthen democratic norms and prevent post-election unrest.

Conversely, unchecked allegations or public speculation might exacerbate polarization, undermine cross-party cooperation, and slow governance processes.

Ultimately, DPP’s actions during this critical tallying period could set a precedent for how political actors in Malawi balance vigilance with the responsibility to uphold national stability and respect institutional independence.